Ask any question about flying or learning how to fly, and get an answer from our community of Flight Instructors (CFIs), and Professional/Private pilots.

Ok, so I've been studying engines in detail and my question perplexes me. If the engine produces the same amount of power at 50 degrees rich of peak as 25 degrees lean of peak; why don't more pilots save the extra fuel and run lean of peak.

What are the advantages of running rich of peak? My instructor always made sure I was running rich of peak. Just curious.

asked Jul 20 '10 at 11:08

RichT%201's gravatar image

RichT 1
6693830

edited Jul 23 '10 at 16:37

Patrick%20Pohler's gravatar image

Patrick Pohler ♦♦
13371841117


From what I understand, running LOP has been an controversial issue with a lot of misinformation and a lot of old pilot tales about the dangers of LOP operation.

I think LOP gets a bad wrap because pilots attempting LOP damage their engines by not having the proper equipment to monitor their engine temps, use bad fuel, don't enrich for high power, or they have another issue in their aircraft that isn't causing the engine to get enough cooling.

Your instructor is probably telling you to run ROP because there might be a restriction placed on LOP operations by the aircraft owner, the instructor wants you to focus on other things as part of your training, and of course he's not paying the fuel bill. You may at least try to convince him to run lean on the ground, since running full rich during taxing can foul the spark plugs. Maybe it'll open the door for an honest talk about LOP?

Found a great slide on LOP from the EAA, if I was an aircraft owner and I had the proper engine monitoring equipment I'd definately get someone familiar with LOP operations to show me how to do it correctly. The fuel savings are huge (and if done properly, the engine runs healthier as well) Running Lean of Peak

answered Jul 23 '10 at 16:37

Patrick%20Pohler's gravatar image

Patrick Pohler ♦♦
13371841117

This is a great answer. Without proper engine instruments, running LOP is not recommended. With proper engine instruments and running LOP will burn less fuel and allow the engine to run thousands of hours past the suggested overhaul. In the end, running LOP will save thousands of dollars over the life of the airplane.

(Jul 23 '10 at 22:58) wbeard52 wbeard52's gravatar image

I think you may have meant to say HUNDREDS of hours past the suggested overhaul.

(Jul 24 '10 at 21:58) Jeff Dale Jeff%20Dale's gravatar image
1

OK. Perhaps a percentage of TBO would be better advice. From what I've read, you can get upwards of 40-50% increase in your TBO by running LOP with proper instruments.
http://www.gami.com/articles/frugalflyer.php
http://www.avweb.com/news/savvyaviator/savvy_aviator_59_egt_cht_and_leaning_198162-1.html

(Jul 25 '10 at 23:14) wbeard52 wbeard52's gravatar image
Your answer
toggle preview

Subscription:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

Tags:

×7
×1

Asked: Jul 20 '10 at 11:08

Seen: 502 times

Last updated: Jul 25 '10 at 23:14

Ready to Fly? Take the first step!

site design / logo © 2010 Anecka, LLC, Anecka, LLC

Creative Commons License
User contributions are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License with attribution required.