Ask any question about flying or learning how to fly, and get an answer from our community of Flight Instructors (CFIs), and Professional/Private pilots.

I'm considering installing some new instrumentation in my 1964 Cessna 150 (with the assistance of my A&P or course). Right now I'm considering eventually getting a CHT gauge, an EGT gauge and a carb temp indicator. My question is which do you find most useful? If it's CHT, should I go with a probe on only the hottest cylinder, or the two back cylinders, or all four?

Right now I'm thinking I'll install a dual CHT gauge first, then the carb air temp and then maybe install a single EGT gauge. The jury is still out on the EGT gauge. At 5.5 gallons an hour running full rich, it's not like I really need to do lean of peak operation on this 37 year old Continental engine. Cost is a factor, and this is mostly just for the sake of doing it, not a necessity. Mostly I just enjoy fixing the old girl up a little at a time.

Anyway, it's blizzard conditions outside as I type this so about all I have to do with aviation for the foreseeable future is think and plan...and I always appreciate the advice of fellow pilots/owners.

asked Dec 12 '10 at 19:17

Jeff%20Dale's gravatar image

Jeff Dale
45561116


From reading your post, it sounds like to me you know something about how fuel is dispersed in the engine. This is only a guess but talking about lean of peak operations require such knowledge. As you know with lean of peak operations, they have a CHT on each cylinder as well as an EGT for each cylinder. They also have GAMI injectors that precisely meter the fuel and air reaching each cylinder. A setup like this is not cheap.

Since you are concerned about cost (and I would too as you wouldn't necessarily get out what you spent for GAMI injectors) this is what I would do. I would first install a CHT for the hottest cylinder and a CHT for the coolest cylinder. This would give you a good ballpark on what the engine is doing. This does not allow you to diagnose quickly if a cylinder is going bad though.

Later on I would install a single EGT knowing it is an average of all the cylinders. Lean of peak operations that I have read give a very strong argument for staying away from danger zone or the range every pilot was initially taught to lean the airplane at altitude above 3000'. Thus, to me, the only value of an EGT is to ensure I stay more than 150 degrees richer / cooler than peak EGT.

As a side note to others reading this, I would not under any circumstances run lean of peak without the required equipment. Doing so will quickly damage your engine beyond repair.

answered Dec 13 '10 at 22:55

wbeard52's gravatar image

wbeard52
206662545

Good suggestion regarding the CHT gauge, I had never thought of doing the hottest and the coolest. You're right about LOP, I have no intention (or need) to do it, at 5.5 gal/hr I'd probably have to live to be 300 years old to recoup the costs, if it even CAN be done on a 37 year old O-200. If I had that kind of scratch, I would not be flying a 150.

(Dec 14 '10 at 20:56) Jeff Dale Jeff%20Dale's gravatar image
Your answer
toggle preview

Subscription:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

Tags:

×7
×5
×1

Asked: Dec 12 '10 at 19:17

Seen: 1,122 times

Last updated: Dec 14 '10 at 20:56

Ready to Fly? Take the first step!

site design / logo © 2010 Anecka, LLC, Anecka, LLC

Creative Commons License
User contributions are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License with attribution required.